From topic discovery to grading, going paperless (aka digital) when you teach the research process is the way to go! I cringe to think of all the wasted paper and index cards that we used during the research process when I was in high school (circa 2000). Not to mention how hard it is to keep track of all those papers. Your students and your back (from carrying all of those papers around) will thank you.
1. Digital Discovery Day
2. Digital Sources
3. Digital Note Taking
I’ll never forget my moment of sheer panic when my brother spilled orange juice on the table; the table that my senior research paper note cards were spread over. Though I salvaged most of them, I had to rewrite too many note cards for my liking only to eventually type some of them in my paper. When I went to college, I was amazed to find that my professors didn’t require or even advocate handwritten notes for the research process. Cue digital note taking!
For me, the note taking aspect of the research process requires several steps, most importantly defining the thesis statement and main points of the paper, so I use this as a guide for my high school students. For middle level student, check this out. Students should have both focus and structure for their note taking so they know what type of information to look for and record. We always begin by defining the thesis statement and main points of the paper, so that the students note taking is driven by their main points. I use this digital research process notebook to guide students to efficient and productive notes. I’ve found that this structure ultimately leads to a well-organized and supported paper.
Digital note taking can take a variety of forms. Here are my favorites:
- Digital Doc: For this format, students write their notes in a document organized by topic or source. They can cut and paste to group the notes however they choose.
- Source Grid: A source grid is a chart that organizes notes into topics across the top of a chart and sources down the side of the chart.
- Sketch Notes: Sketch notes are visual note taking. My friend, Danielle, from StudyAllKnight has a great post on using Google Classroom in combination with the Noteability app for visual note taking.
4. Digital Documentation
For scholarly sources, students usually can find a bibliography for that source in the database or search engine.
Note: I always begin with a caution that students must double check their formatting with the associated style (I use APA and MLA depending on the assignment). Too often they get into the habit of copying and pasting whatever the citation generator throws at them even if it’s totally incorrect. I tell them that the citation generator is there to help you, but they must determine if it gave them correct information. For cross checking their citation format, we use Purdue Owl.
5. Digital Writing
6. Digital Peer Review and Plagiarism Checker
I always give them guidelines for their feedback so they don’t simply write, “good.” As an example, I might give them five areas of focus: thesis effectiveness, organization effectiveness, word choice suggestions, one positive summary statement, and one summary suggestion for the paper as a whole.
When students receive their papers with comments from two reviewers, they use the “resolve” option to clean up their papers and the comments. This deletes the comment, but a record of the comment is saved in the comment button at the top. This is important if you want to give credit for peer editing.
To prepare students for college-level and real-world research processes, I find that giving them the opportunity to check their own papers for “matches” is a meaningful way to teach about avoiding plagiarism. I use the word match because that is what a plagiarism checker provides, a match to another source. A program or website cannot determine plagiarism; only a person can determine if the match was plagiarism, either intentional or unintentional. It is the student’s task to review each match.
Sometimes, the match is simply common knowledge that happens to be stated in a similar way. For example, there are only so many ways to say, “Edgar Allan Poe was born in Boston, Massachusetts.” Even though the student would probably find many direct matches to it, it isn’t plagiarism. Maybe the student has an error in their citation punctuation; this could cause the plagiarism checker to find the match. Maybe the student simply forgot a citation. In this case, they fix it and move along. However, what would happen if you didn’t give this lesson? Now, you, as the teacher, have quite the conundrum. How do you know if it was unintentional? Does your school have a zero tolerance policy? Will this student fail the paper? Ugh! Save yourself the agony and give them the chance to revise their mistakes before it’s too late! If after you give this opportunity and knowledge they still have an issue, you can feel much better knowing how to proceed.
There are many free plagiarism checkers, and they work similarly. My technology coach and I have searched so many free plagiarism checkers, and we’ve determined QueText to be best for our needs. If you have any other suggestions, please let us know by leaving a comment below.
7. Digital Grading